Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of combined application of sevoflurane and remifentanil on laparoscopic surgery, postoperative recovery time and stress response

Yong Chen , Hongkai Lin

Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Guangdong Province, China;

For correspondence:-  Yong Chen   Email: chenyong_zs@126.com   Tel:+8618028389003

Accepted: 28 September 2022        Published: 28 October 2022

Citation: Chen Y, Lin H. Effect of combined application of sevoflurane and remifentanil on laparoscopic surgery, postoperative recovery time and stress response. Trop J Pharm Res 2022; 21(10):2167-2173 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v21i10.18

© 2022 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of application of sevoflurane and remifentanil on laparoscopic surgery, and its effect on patients’ postoperative recovery time and stress response.
Methods: Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Guangdong Province, China were selected and randomly divided into propofol group (PG) and sevoflurane group (SG), with 45 patients in each group. Patients in PG were anesthetized with combination of propofol and remifentanil, while those in SG received combination of sevoflurane and remifentanil. Patients’ heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were tested before anesthesia induction (T1), after intubation (T2), 15 min after pneumoperitoneum (T3), and after extubation (T4), in order to evaluate the stability of vital signs in the patients.
Results: At T2, T3, and T4, HR, SV, and MAP were more stable in SG than in PG (p < 0.05). At T3 and T4, the levels of ET-1, noradrenaline (NE) and cortisol (Cor) were significantly lower in SG than in PG (p < 0.05). Furthermore, postoperative recovery time, spontaneous breathing time, time taken to open the eyes under command, and orientation recovery time were shorter in SG than in PG (p < 0.05). After awakening, SG had significantly higher Ramsay score than PG (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The combined use of sevoflurane and remifentanil for anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery results in stable vital signs, facilitates recovery after surgery, improve quality of recovery, and reduce stress response. Therefore, the combination anesthesia merits further mechanistic and large-scale investigation before clinical application.

Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery, Remifentanil, Sevoflurane, Recovery time, Stress response

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates